The Abuja Division of the Federal High Court on Wednesday nullified and set aside the ward and local government congresses conducted on February 7 by the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kogi.

The congresses were conducted to nominate a governorship candidate for the November governorship election in the state.

Justice James Omotosho nullified and set aside the congresses while delivering judgement in a suit instituted by a group of aggrieved APC members led by Rilwan Okpanachi.

The court voided the two congresses on grounds that they were not conducted in compliance with the Electoral Act 2022 and the constitution of the APC.

The court barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or using the unlawful delegates list from unlawful congresses for the party to select its governorship flag bearer.

Mr Omotosho ordered the APC leadership to conduct fresh congresses that would comply with section 84 of the Electoral Act, 2022 and section 13 of the party’s constitution.

The judge agreed with the plaintiffs that the APC in Kogi failed to conduct ward and local government congresses as stipulated by relevant law provisions.

He also agreed with Ogwu James Onoja, SAN, and counsel to the plaintiffs, that the APC breached section 84 of the Electoral Act and section 13 of its constitution.

He said this was by concocting the purported list of delegates and submitting same to INEC without the knowledge of registered members of the party in the state.

The judge held that during the case trial, the APC failed to disclose the venues and times where the purported ward and local government congresses were held.

He said the party also failed to show the report of INEC officials that purportedly monitored the elections.

He further held that the APC should have produced the result sheet to show the scores recorded by the participants in the purported congresses.

The judge said that the major document put at the court’s disposal to justify the conduct of the said February 7 congresses did not contain a single name of any human being.

He said it rather had signatures of imaginary participants at the purported congresses.

With the absence of names on the documents, the judge said that the exhibit was worthless and that no probate value could be attached because it was against section 133 of the Evidence Act.

Earlier, the judge dismissed the preliminary objections raised by APC that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

The plaintiffs in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/329/2023 are Rilwan Okpanachi, Yahaya Nuhu, Omaonu Arome, Mustapha Idoko, Aku Goodman, and Abu Onechiojo.

The APC and INEC are the first and second defendants.

(NAN)