Citing Section 45 of the Nigerian Constitution, Mr Malami argued that Nigerians’ right to freedom of information may be limited as was done with the Twitter ban.
The court adjourned to July 9 to enable it go over the proceedings once since the same parties are involved in all the applications.
“Any interference with Twitter is viewed as inference with human rights, and that will violate human rights,” the court held.
The court said that the repayment accrued from an outstanding loan granted the government in 2005.
The suspects said they were detained in inhuman conditions and subjected to torture.
