He did, however, suggest that the Nigerian leader might have obtained the certificate from online businesses that specialise in forgery.
Mr Abubakar wants to use the document to prove Mr Tinubu committed perjury and, therefore, is unqualified to be Nigeria’s president.
Mr Tinubu’s murky past has been weaponised to destroy his reputation, his lawyers said.
In response, Mr Tinubu’s lawyers said that the inconsistencies should be blamed on the clerk, which seems to corroborate CSU’s stance on the matter.
The Nigerian president is fighting off a suit that Atiku Abubakar brought under a U.S. statute that allows local documents to be subpoenaed for use as evidence in a foreign court.
