A former Minister of Power, Dr Olu Agunloye, on Thursday told an Abuja High Court that the amendment of the charge by the EFCC in his ongoing trial was an overreach.

Mr Agunloye is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in a suit, marked FCT/HC/CR/617/2023, on a seven-count.

He is charged with forgery, disobedience of presidential order and corruption allegedly committed in the Mambilla power plant project.

The EFCC alleged that Mr Agunloye on May 22, 2003 awarded a contract titled “Construction of 3,960 megawatt Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Station on Build, Operate and Transfer basis to Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited,’’ without any budgetary provision, approval and cash backing.

The commission also alleged that it traced some suspicious payments made by Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited to accounts of the former minister, who served in the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The defendant, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge.

At the resumed hearing in the case while adopting his processes against the amendment of the charge by EFCC, Mr Agunloye through his counsel, Adeola Adedipe SAN, urged the court to dismiss the prosecution’s application for amendment.

Mr Adedipe argued that no cogent and verifiable reasons were adduced for such an amendment.

He submitted that Leno Adesanya, whose name was imported into the amended charge by the virtue of the judgment of Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja, had acquired a declarative right in realm.

According to him, that right was enforceable by the court by virtue of Section 287(3) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

The prosecution counsel, Abba Muhammed SAN, however, objected to the submission.

He asserted that the prosecution’s right to fair hearing as guaranteed by Section 36 of the Constitution would be violated if the defendant’s oral submission was taken into account.

Earlier, Mr Muhammad while adopting the complainant’s processes said that the motion on notice seeking to amend the charge against the former minister was brought pursuant to Sections 216(1) and (2) and 217 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015.

He then urged the court to grant the prosecution’s prayers, seeking an order granting leave to amend the instant charge against the defendant.

He added an order seeing the amended charge filed on June 25 against the former minister properly filed and served.

Explaining how the amended charge was an overreach in his process, Mr Adedipe argued that EFCC, through the amended charge, was trying to repair the admission by its first witness (PW1) that nothing was in Agunloye’s bank statement.

He added that disclosing transfer or receipt of monies by him from Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited, which he described as “damaging” to the prosecution.

Mr Adedipe prayed the court to take note of the prosecution’s attempt to amend the charge.

He said, “The prosecution will continue to amend at every instance evidence of its witnesses are demolished; thus making proceedings to be a hide and seek.’’

He submitted that in spite of Justice Ekwo’s judgment prohibiting the complainant from investigating or prosecuting anything relating to the Mambilla project, it still sought to “clandestinely infuse the name of Leno Adesanya in the charge and continue prosecution of this case.”

On its part, the EFCC, in one of its processes, submitted that it could in an instance of such an amendment by the prosecution the court was required by law to take fresh plea of the defendant.

EFCC further submitted that going by the provisions of ACJA and the various authorities it cited to argue in favour of its application for amendment of the charge, the court had the power to grant the application as prayed.

Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie, after listening to their submissions, adjourned the case until January 23 for ruling.

(NAN)