The Lagos Division of the Federal High Court on Tuesday reserved judgment in a suit filed against a Lagos surgeon, Anuoluwapo Adepoju.

Ms Adepoju is charged by the Federal Competition and Consumers Protection Commission (FCCPC).

She is standing trial alongside her Clinic, MedContour Services Ltd, on a five-count charge bordering on a refusal to honour an invitation for an investigation into post-body surgery complications, as well as the production of investigation documents.

She was rearraigned on July 17, 2020, alongside her medical outfit,

Justice Mohammed Liman had fixed Tuesday for judgment, after respective parties had adopted their final addresses in November 2023.

But the judgment was not ready on Tuesday as earlier scheduled, and the court informed parties that a new date would be communicated to parties soon.

The defendant was charged by the FCCPC.

She had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was granted bail on own recognizance.

Mr Liman was subsequently transfered out of the Lagos division of the court. But he still presided over the case on a fiat.

Trial commenced in the suit with the prosecution calling several witnesses, and thereafter closed its case

The defence on its part, filed a no-case submission on the grounds that no case had been established against the defendant by prosecution, to warrant her entering her defence.

Mr Liman had in a ruling delivered on April 7, 2022 rejected the no-case submission by the defendant.

Mr Liman had ruled that the evidence tendered before the court, satisfies the elements of the criminal charges pending against the defendant.

The court had consequently, ordered the defendant to open her defence.

The case, however, suffered several adjournment on different dates, for various reasons.

On May 5, 2023, the defence began defence and called the first defendant as sole witness.

The defendant was led in evidence and also cross examined after which the court adjourned the case until June 21, 2023 for adoption of written addresses.

On June 21, 2023 the court did not sit and the case was then adjourned until July 17, 2023 and again adjourned untill October 24, 2023 and then November 20, 2023

On November 20, 2023 the adoption of addresses by counsel was held virtually and judgment fixed for January 23.

A new date for judgment will now be communicated to parties.

In the five-count charge brought against the defendants, the prosecution alleged that, the first defendant failed to appear before the FCCPC in relation to investigation into a reported failed buttocks enlargement surgery.

The defendant was alleged to have failed to show up, in compliance with the commission’s summons dated April 15, 2020.

The prosecution also alleged that without sufficient cause, the first defendant also refused and failed to produce documents which she was required to produce in compliance with the commission’s notice of investigation dated April 14, 2020.

The defendant was alleged to have prevented and obstructed the commission from carrying out its investigation into the said issue.

The offence, the state said contravenes the provision of sections 11(1)(a), 33(1)(a), 110, 113(1)(a) and 159(4) of the FCCPC Act, 2018.

(NAN)