The judgement delivered on Thursday postponed the battle over the Nigerian president’s certificate forgery till 2027 general elections.
As the Supreme Court hears 2023 petitions, the main opposition leader lampooned the Nigerian president as unremorseful over his lengthy track of criminal falsification of records.
The evidence for this conclusion lies in the fact that the Southwest College transcript shows clearly that the transcript belongs to a female.
Atiku decries APC’s Muslim-Muslim ticket but sees nothing wrong in violating his party’s zoning that would have ensured a rotational presidency.
As the president braces a steep political price, Nigerians have asked how he managed to ride a well-documented pattern of constitutional violations to the nation’s highest office.
The Lagos-based attorney recently condemned the Supreme Court and castigated its current cohort as delivering judgments based on a confused mindset rather than evidence and law.
Judge Nancy Maldonado, however, compelled CSU to release Mr Tinubu’s record leading to the deposition that exposed Mr Tinubu’s forgery.
“And it is the duty of the accuser to fish out the said vendor and get that evidence.”
He asserted the documents could not have been obtained earlier due to the legal red tape in the U.S., where he got them from.
