Tariff Hike: Court delivers judgment in MultiChoice suit against FCCPC May 8

On Thursday, the Federal High Court, Abuja Division, fixed May 8 for judgment in a suit filed by MultiChoice Nigeria Limited against the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission.
MultiChoice is seeking to stop the FCCPC from sanctioning it over its recent increase in the DStv and GOtv subscriptions.
Justice James Omotosho fixed the date after counsel for MultiChoice, Moyosore Onigbanjo, and FCCPC’s lawyer, J.E.O. Abugu, adopted their processes and presented their arguments for and against the suit.
Mr Omotosho had, on March 12, restrained FCCPC from sanctioning the pay-TV company until the hearing and determination of the substance suit.
The judge gave the order after an ex parte motion marked FHC/ABJ/CS/379/2025 and moved by Mr Onigbanjo to the effect.
The FCCPC had summoned MultiChoice Nigeria Ltd. to provide explanations regarding the March 1 price review of its packages.
The commission directed the company’s chief executive officer to appear for an investigative hearing on February 27, raising concerns over frequent price hikes, potential market dominance abuse and anti-competitive practices within the pay-TV industry.
The FCCPC also issued a stern warning, stating that failure to justify the price adjustment or comply with fair market principles would lead to regulatory sanctions.
However, in the ex parte motion filed by MultiChoice’s legal team led by Mr Onigbanjo, the company sought an order of interim injunction restraining the FCCPC and its officers from carrying out the threat against it, as communicated via a letter dated March 3, pending the hearing and determination of the motion for an interlocutory injunction.
It also sought an order restraining the commission and its officers from issuing any further directive or taking any steps capable of disrupting its business activities, pending the hearing and determination of the motion for an interlocutory injunction.
Lastly, it sought an order of interim injunction restraining the FCCPC, its agents, servants, or privies from sanctioning or penalising MultiChoice (the applicant) in any manner whatsoever in relation to its price increase pending the hearing and determination of the motion for an interlocutory injunction.
(NAN)
We have recently deactivated our website's comment provider in favour of other channels of distribution and commentary. We encourage you to join the conversation on our stories via our Facebook, Twitter and other social media pages.
More from Peoples Gazette

States
Independence: NBA urges Nigerians to expect better future
The NBA said that ordinary Nigerians should be deriving benefit from the subsidy removal rather than hardship.

Agriculture
FG tasks ECOWAS on leveraging financing strategies for agroecology
The federal government has urged stakeholders in the agriculture and finance sectors in the West Africa region to leverage financing strategies to enhance agroecology practices

Politics
Katsina youths pledge to deliver over 2 million votes to Atiku
“Katsina State is Atiku’s political base because it is his second home.”

States
APGA adopts Tinubu as presidential candidate, targets 50% votes in Anambra
Mr Soludo urged the people of the state to support Mr Tinubu in the 2027 election.

Lagos
Band A: TCN faults Ikeja Electric over claims of grid instability
TCN described as inaccurate and misleading IKEDC’s public notice on Friday.

States
Oyo begins 2026 bursary screening for final-year students
The timetable shows that students in colleges will be screened on November 11 and 12, while HND applicants will attend from November 13 to 17.

World
Activists storm Microsoft AI data centre in Netherlands amid European backlash
The group demanded that data centre construction be suspended.

Showbiz
Chris Okafor: Court grants Doris Ogala ₦30 million bail
As part of the bail conditions, the court also ordered Ms Ogala to surrender her international passport to the court registrar.

Lagos
LASERC inaugurates panel to address unresolved electricity complaints
The initiative aims to provide consumers with an accessible and transparent platform to seek redress.





