Tariff Hike: Court delivers judgment in MultiChoice suit against FCCPC May 8
On Thursday, the Federal High Court, Abuja Division, fixed May 8 for judgment in a suit filed by MultiChoice Nigeria Limited against the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission.
MultiChoice is seeking to stop the FCCPC from sanctioning it over its recent increase in the DStv and GOtv subscriptions.
Justice James Omotosho fixed the date after counsel for MultiChoice, Moyosore Onigbanjo, and FCCPC’s lawyer, J.E.O. Abugu, adopted their processes and presented their arguments for and against the suit.
Mr Omotosho had, on March 12, restrained FCCPC from sanctioning the pay-TV company until the hearing and determination of the substance suit.
The judge gave the order after an ex parte motion marked FHC/ABJ/CS/379/2025 and moved by Mr Onigbanjo to the effect.
The FCCPC had summoned MultiChoice Nigeria Ltd. to provide explanations regarding the March 1 price review of its packages.
The commission directed the company’s chief executive officer to appear for an investigative hearing on February 27, raising concerns over frequent price hikes, potential market dominance abuse and anti-competitive practices within the pay-TV industry.
The FCCPC also issued a stern warning, stating that failure to justify the price adjustment or comply with fair market principles would lead to regulatory sanctions.
However, in the ex parte motion filed by MultiChoice’s legal team led by Mr Onigbanjo, the company sought an order of interim injunction restraining the FCCPC and its officers from carrying out the threat against it, as communicated via a letter dated March 3, pending the hearing and determination of the motion for an interlocutory injunction.
It also sought an order restraining the commission and its officers from issuing any further directive or taking any steps capable of disrupting its business activities, pending the hearing and determination of the motion for an interlocutory injunction.
Lastly, it sought an order of interim injunction restraining the FCCPC, its agents, servants, or privies from sanctioning or penalising MultiChoice (the applicant) in any manner whatsoever in relation to its price increase pending the hearing and determination of the motion for an interlocutory injunction.
(NAN)
We have recently deactivated our website's comment provider in favour of other channels of distribution and commentary. We encourage you to join the conversation on our stories via our Facebook, Twitter and other social media pages.
More from Peoples Gazette
Agriculture
FG tasks ECOWAS on leveraging financing strategies for agroecology
The federal government has urged stakeholders in the agriculture and finance sectors in the West Africa region to leverage financing strategies to enhance agroecology practices
Politics
Katsina youths pledge to deliver over 2 million votes to Atiku
“Katsina State is Atiku’s political base because it is his second home.”
States
Makinde charges Oyo commissioners to stay committed as administration enters final lap
Mr Makinde urged government appointees to prioritise legacy over tenure, citing the late Obafemi Awolowo as an example.
States
Oyo police arrest man, recover pistol, drugs
The police said the investigation is ongoing, with efforts intensified to identify, track, and apprehend the fleeing suspects.
States
Gov. Sani appoints new aides, board chairs to enhance service delivery
Mr Musa said that the appointments are part of the ongoing efforts to strengthen governance and inject fresh energy into public service.
States
Police detain suspect over illegal possession of firearm in Enugu
The police said a concealed locally made double-barrelled pistol was found in the suspect’s possession during a search.
Politics
Appeal Court upholds judgment barring INEC from recognising Mark-led ADC congresses
Justice Mohammed held that the case that precipitated the restraining order bordered on a non-justiciable internal affair of a political party.
Heading 5
NMDPRA seals Mobil, Mangerborn Energy in Ogun for under-dispensing fuel
Mr Adebowale stated that the action became necessary due to repeated breaches of regulatory requirements by the affected filling stations.
